<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Cache-A LTO-4 Prime-Cache Archive Appliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.suitetake.com/2009/09/24/review-cache-a-lto-4-a-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/09/24/review-cache-a-lto-4-a-series/</link>
	<description>Post Production Technology, Reviews, Experiences &#38; Opinion from the Edit Suite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:09:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gastonhinostroza</title>
		<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/09/24/review-cache-a-lto-4-a-series/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>gastonhinostroza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suitetake.com/?p=2766#comment-195</guid>
		<description>My question is if I hand an LTO to one of my network clients who does NOT have Cache-A will they be able to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a.) see what;s on the tape and if so how and will is have the ICON catalog look above and &lt;br&gt;b.) do I need to use the internal SW to make the LTO/.tar files or can I use instead, say Z-datadump or WinZip or WinRara which are non-proprietary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is if I hand an LTO to one of my network clients who does NOT have Cache-A will they be able to:</p>
<p>a.) see what;s on the tape and if so how and will is have the ICON catalog look above and <br />b.) do I need to use the internal SW to make the LTO/.tar files or can I use instead, say Z-datadump or WinZip or WinRara which are non-proprietary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewfallondottv</title>
		<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/09/24/review-cache-a-lto-4-a-series/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewfallondottv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suitetake.com/?p=2766#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Great article! I can definitely attest to a &quot;dumb&quot; LTO drive. We have a Superloader LTO3 which needs a host card, backup software, and, of course, the Superloader to operate. Add in the server it&#039;s running off, I dread when we have problems and I have to do the round robin of phone calls. We bought it about the same time the A drives came out and were a bit more expensive. It was a budget call, and it&#039;s been a great investment, but some of the features the A drives give you would be great. Especially the easier access without having to go through Retrospect, which can seem very archaic these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I can definitely attest to a &#8220;dumb&#8221; LTO drive. We have a Superloader LTO3 which needs a host card, backup software, and, of course, the Superloader to operate. Add in the server it&#39;s running off, I dread when we have problems and I have to do the round robin of phone calls. We bought it about the same time the A drives came out and were a bit more expensive. It was a budget call, and it&#39;s been a great investment, but some of the features the A drives give you would be great. Especially the easier access without having to go through Retrospect, which can seem very archaic these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
