<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAB Preivew: Cache-A LTO-4 Archive Drive for Video Pros</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.suitetake.com/2009/04/06/nab-preivew-cache-a-lto-4-archive-drive-for-video-pros/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/04/06/nab-preivew-cache-a-lto-4-archive-drive-for-video-pros/</link>
	<description>Post Production Technology, Reviews, Experiences &#38; Opinion from the Edit Suite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:09:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lucian evans</title>
		<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/04/06/nab-preivew-cache-a-lto-4-archive-drive-for-video-pros/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>lucian evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suitetake.com/?p=1511#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Hi&lt;br&gt;I was wondering how easy the workflow was to put a project back together once it has been archived to LTO4? &lt;br&gt;thanks&lt;br&gt;Lucian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />I was wondering how easy the workflow was to put a project back together once it has been archived to LTO4? <br />thanks<br />Lucian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Cache-a LTO-4 A-Series : SuiteTake.com</title>
		<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/04/06/nab-preivew-cache-a-lto-4-archive-drive-for-video-pros/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Cache-a LTO-4 A-Series : SuiteTake.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suitetake.com/?p=1511#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] you have not already done so, you may want to give my last post a quick review, as it gives a history of how we ended up here after having lots of issues with our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you have not already done so, you may want to give my last post a quick review, as it gives a history of how we ended up here after having lots of issues with our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Editblog &#187; Linkage: April 09</title>
		<link>http://www.suitetake.com/2009/04/06/nab-preivew-cache-a-lto-4-archive-drive-for-video-pros/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>The Editblog &#187; Linkage: April 09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suitetake.com/?p=1511#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Suite Take has an article on LTO-4 tape archiving. Of interest if you have a bunch of RED footage in lying around on hard drives. And while we&#8217;re on the topic of lots of data on drives read about a Man Crushed Under Weight of 34 Terabytes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Suite Take has an article on LTO-4 tape archiving. Of interest if you have a bunch of RED footage in lying around on hard drives. And while we&#8217;re on the topic of lots of data on drives read about a Man Crushed Under Weight of 34 Terabytes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
